{"id":762605,"date":"2024-11-05T07:35:20","date_gmt":"2024-11-05T07:35:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/?p=762605"},"modified":"2024-11-05T11:10:44","modified_gmt":"2024-11-05T11:10:44","slug":"cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office","title":{"rendered":"Cladding removal could cost up to \u00a322bn, says National Audit Office"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The National Audit Office (NAO) said in a major report yesterday (4 November) that the cost of remediating thousands of buildings with Grenfell-style cladding could end up reaching \u00a322.4 billion.<\/p>\n<p>The Department of Housing, Communities &amp; Local Government (MHCLG) is due to contribute \u00a39.1 billion towards remediation. However up to \u00a35 billion of this public money outlay could be recouped following the introduction of a levy on new developments.<\/p>\n<p>Yet the final sums needed to solve the nation\u2019s cladding crisis are still unknown. The NAO\u2019s potential cost estimates vary significantly, ranging from a lower figure of \u00a312.6 billion to the now-revealed plus \u00a320 billion sum.<\/p>\n<p>The spending watchdog said this was because the exact number of buildings above 11m needing remediation remained unconfirmed.<\/p>\n<p>The NAO estimates that 7,200 buildings requiring remediation are still unidentified \u2013 up to 60 per cent of the government\u2019s estimate of 9,000 to 12,000 buildings.<\/p>\n<p>That could mean around 60 per cent of the buildings with dangerous cladding have yet to be identified, and some may never be found, the watchdog said.<\/p>\n<p>It added that the government had a \u2018long way to go\u2019 before remediation work was completed on all affected buildings and that its 2035 target was in doubt without a target date for completing remediation work.<\/p>\n<p>But it conceded that some progress was being made thanks to a \u2018substantial increase in remediation activity\u2019 since the summer, with several schemes bought together under one umbrella in 2023.<\/p>\n<p>The NAO said the government should consider making it mandatory to register buildings between 11 and 18m tall, instead of just 18m and above, to help identify the remaining homes.<\/p>\n<p>NAO head Gareth Davies said: \u2018There is a long way to go before all affected buildings are made safe, and [there are] risks MHCLG must address if its approach is to succeed.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Putting the onus on developers to pay and introducing a more proportionate approach to remediation should help to protect taxpayers\u2019 money. Yet it has also created grounds for dispute, causing delays.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>So far, work has started on 4,771 buildings above 11m\u2013 accounting for approximately 258,000 homes \u2013 and around one third is complete, the NAO says.<\/p>\n<p>The NAO\u2019s report follows the publication of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/studio-e-bears-very-significant-responsibility-for-disaster-finds-grenfell-tower-inquiry\">final report<\/a> from the inquiry into the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire, which found that \u2018systemic dishonesty\u2019 on the part of cladding manufacturers contributed to the fire.<\/p>\n<p>Architect Studio E, which oversaw the tower\u2019s fatal refurbishment, was found to have an \u2018overriding responsibility\u2019 for the blaze, which killed 72 people.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The National Audit Office (NAO) said in a major report yesterday (4 November) that the cost of remediating thousands of buildings with Grenfell-style cladding could end up reaching \u00a322.4 billion. The Department of Housing, Communities &amp; Local Government (MHCLG) is due to contribute \u00a39.1 billion towards remediation. However up to \u00a35 billion of this public &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":131789,"featured_media":753524,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_oasis_is_in_workflow":0,"_oasis_original":0,"ep_exclude_from_search":false},"categories":[681],"tags":[76153,2023,72820,2281],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Cladding removal could cost up to \u00a322bn, says National Audit Office<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Remediating the country\u2019s dangerously clad buildings could cost up to \u00a322 billion, the government spending watchdog has warned\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cladding removal could cost up to \u00a322bn, says National Audit Office\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Remediating the country\u2019s dangerously clad buildings could cost up to \u00a322 billion, the government spending watchdog has warned\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Architects\u2019 Journal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-05T07:35:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-05T11:10:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/cdn.rt.emap.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2024\/08\/27165745\/London-Uk-March-23rd-2024-A-residential-block-in-London-having-the-cladding-replaced-to-prevent-fire-risks.-Shutterstock-1024x683.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Gino Spocchia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Gino Spocchia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office\",\"name\":\"Cladding removal could cost up to \u00a322bn, says National Audit Office\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-05T07:35:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-05T11:10:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/person\/779aa0e54c8c20bf4509b8cce80c65b0\"},\"description\":\"Remediating the country\u2019s dangerously clad buildings could cost up to \u00a322 billion, the government spending watchdog has warned\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cladding removal could cost up to \u00a322bn, says National Audit Office\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/\",\"name\":\"The Architects\u2019 Journal\",\"description\":\"Architecture News &amp; Buildings\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/person\/779aa0e54c8c20bf4509b8cce80c65b0\",\"name\":\"Gino Spocchia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/ff22f86c19263bf2f9ca73b4d596096f\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ace0cb1667a73da3fb8f9f2e77f8b97?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ace0cb1667a73da3fb8f9f2e77f8b97?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Gino Spocchia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/author\/gino-spocchia\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cladding removal could cost up to \u00a322bn, says National Audit Office","description":"Remediating the country\u2019s dangerously clad buildings could cost up to \u00a322 billion, the government spending watchdog has warned","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cladding removal could cost up to \u00a322bn, says National Audit Office","og_description":"Remediating the country\u2019s dangerously clad buildings could cost up to \u00a322 billion, the government spending watchdog has warned","og_url":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office","og_site_name":"The Architects\u2019 Journal","article_published_time":"2024-11-05T07:35:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-05T11:10:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/cdn.rt.emap.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2024\/08\/27165745\/London-Uk-March-23rd-2024-A-residential-block-in-London-having-the-cladding-replaced-to-prevent-fire-risks.-Shutterstock-1024x683.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Gino Spocchia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Gino Spocchia","Estimated reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office","url":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office","name":"Cladding removal could cost up to \u00a322bn, says National Audit Office","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-11-05T07:35:20+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-05T11:10:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/person\/779aa0e54c8c20bf4509b8cce80c65b0"},"description":"Remediating the country\u2019s dangerously clad buildings could cost up to \u00a322 billion, the government spending watchdog has warned","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/news\/cladding-removal-could-cost-up-to-22bn-says-national-audit-office#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cladding removal could cost up to \u00a322bn, says National Audit Office"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/","name":"The Architects\u2019 Journal","description":"Architecture News &amp; Buildings","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/person\/779aa0e54c8c20bf4509b8cce80c65b0","name":"Gino Spocchia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/ff22f86c19263bf2f9ca73b4d596096f","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ace0cb1667a73da3fb8f9f2e77f8b97?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9ace0cb1667a73da3fb8f9f2e77f8b97?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Gino Spocchia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/author\/gino-spocchia"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/762605"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/131789"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=762605"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/762605\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":762670,"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/762605\/revisions\/762670"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/753524"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=762605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=762605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.architectsjournal.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=762605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}